Karen Sloan, Texas Lawyer
Andrew Morriss oversaw the transformation and dramatic rise in the rankings of the former Texas Wesleyan School of Law into the Texas A&M School of Law.
He was the first dean hired by Texas A&M after it bought in 2013, and since then the school has steadily risen from U.S. News & World Report’s unranked tier to claim the No. 92 spot—an almost unheard of ascent.
Now, the university has a new challenge for Morriss: heading up a brand new School of Innovation at its main campus in College Station, a gig he will assume Aug. 1.
Legal academics generally aren’t known as innovators. After all, modern law school largely follows the case method format pioneered by Christopher Columbus Langdell at Harvard Law School more than 120 years ago. But Morriss introduced a steady stream of changes at the Fort Worth law school intended to make it more competitive and relevant in today’s legal market.
We spoke with Morriss about what a school of innovation is, the changes at Texas A&M’s law school, and the need for legal educators to embrace new ways of teaching and structuring their law schools. His answers have been edited for length.
What, exactly is this new School of Innovation, or “I-School” as the university has dubbed it?
This is going to be a very different kind of academic unit. We’re not going to have any permanent faculty. We’re not going to have any majors, though ultimately we hope to offer a minor. A big part of my charge is to facilitate students and faculty to create student-led, high-impact learning experiences that will help them learn the skills employers want: working on teams; being creative; being entrepreneurial; being innovative.
What’s an example of a “student-led, high-impact learning experience?”
Let’s say you had students with an idea about putting sensors on campus buses and creating an app that reported to students where buses were. They would need some engineering people, and maybe some people from transportation services, and a finance major to figure out how it would get funded. They would design it and put together a plan for how to do it, and we’d facilitate that.
Law schools aren’t really known for being innovative places. In fact, they’re generally seen as risk averse. Is that a fair assessment in 2017?
I think it has been accurate. I think there are some very innovative people in legal education who are starting to change that. Law schools have started to realize there aren’t that many people going anymore. I hope that Whittier announcing that it’s closing its law school is a wake-up call that more of legal education needs to get more innovative, and it shouldn’t all look the same. People need to be doing different things.
What innovations have you pursued at Texas A&M in your time there?
One is that we rethought our first-year curriculum. We added a class called professional identity that’s built around the six Aggie core values: Excellence, integrity, leadership, selfless service, respect and loyalty. We started getting students to think about their life as a professional right at the start. We added a one-credit January course that bridges the first and second semester that covers dispute resolution, so that when you go into the second semester, you’re not thinking litigation is the only way to address stuff. At the end of the year, students have the option to go on a two-week field trip to visit a foreign legal system, and hopefully get a fresh perspective on the U.S. legal system.
The idea is to have narrative arc to your experience in law school. There should be growth. By your third year, you should be doing stuff that lawyers do, in clinics and externships. We expanded our clinical offerings and really looked at giving everyone the opportunity to transition from the “thinking like a lawyer” stage to the “doing like a lawyer” stage.