Curve ball in patent case: Zito LLC Files Patent Infringement Lawsuit Against Cal Ripken, Jr.’s, Companies
WAMPSCOTT, MA (PRWEB) JUNE 26, 2017
Zito LLC announced that it filed suit for patent infringement in the District of Maryland, Baltimore Division, against Cal Ripken, Jr.’s companies, CRJ, Inc. and Ripken Baseball Camps and Clinics LLC, for patent infringement. The Docket Number is 1:17-cv-01733.
Plaintiff Zito LLC is the owner and assignee of all substantial rights, title and interest to U.S. Patent No. 7,398,921 (“the 921 Patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 9,443,369 (“the 369 Patent”), and patents pending, which derive from the 921 Patent issued to Arthur Zito Jr. by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on July 15, 2008.
Arthur Zito, owner and CEO of Zito LLC, explains: “Each of these patents, titled ‘User-Specific Dispensing System,’ I would describe in a non-limiting way to be the first customized dispensing system based on user characteristics such as age, gender, demographics, legal authority or role that a user has within a group. The patents cover customized vending machines and sports ball dispensers such as baseball pitching machines that adjust the dispensation based on the user, among other applications.”
Cal Ripken’s companies are accused of using a Fungoman ® FM-250 Automated Baseball Practice Machine and identification methods for identifying user characteristics to adjust the machine for Ripken’s Performance Metrics (“RPM”) system.
According to court documents, Zito alleges that Ripken’s companies derive millions of dollars in annual revenue from participants and sponsorships with its baseball camps, clinics, and skills training seminars by using the Fungoman ® machine that directly infringes Zito’s patents.
Zito alleges that he first identified his patented intellectual property to Ripken’s companies in 2013, and he provided them published documents for his 921 Patent and his then pending patent application for his now issued 369 Patent in March 2014 with the intent to partner with Ripken’s companies in developing the valuable and innovative technology described in his patents. Ripken’s companies have no license rights to the 921 and 369 Patents. Zito alleges that over the past several years, Mr. Ripken and top executives at Ripken’s companies have declined a business relationship with Mr. Zito and have instead opted to incorporate the Patents’ claimed features into the RPM system without authorization.
Mr. Zito filed his application for the 921 Patent in 2004, and has several additional patents that cover similar innovative technology. He says: “My patents for a User-Specific Dispensing System represent the first technology for customized vending that dispense items, services, or more, including how an item is dispensed based on user characteristics, such as demographics and other user-specific information.”
Zito LLC is represented by Peter Corcoran of Corcoran IP Law PLLC and Jan Berlage of Gohn Hankey Stichel & Berlage LLP.
Media Relations Contact
Arthur Zito, Jr.